Side by sideSuburb comparison

Patterson Lakes vs Chelsea Heights.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,575,000 and $1,008,500. Chelsea Heights edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Chelsea Heights (median $1,008,500) is roughly 56% cheaper to buy into than Patterson Lakes ($1,575,000).

Chelsea Heights scores higher on walkability (8/100 vs 12/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Chelsea Heights (1079) sits above Patterson Lakes (1040).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Chelsea Heights is the lower entry point at $1,008,500 median, 56% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Chelsea Heights offers the higher gross rental yield (2.04% vs 1.39%), favouring cash-flow investors.

For families

Chelsea Heights edges out on average school ICSEA (1079 vs 1040).

Common questionsPatterson Lakes vs Chelsea Heights

Common questions

Is Patterson Lakes or Chelsea Heights cheaper to buy in?

Chelsea Heights has the lower median house price at $1,008,500, roughly 56% below Patterson Lakes ($1,575,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Does Patterson Lakes or Chelsea Heights have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Chelsea Heights scores 1079 vs 1040 in Patterson Lakes. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Patterson Lakes or Chelsea Heights?

Chelsea Heights scores 12/100 on walkability vs 8/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Patterson Lakes or Chelsea Heights?

Gross rental yield on houses is 2.04% in Chelsea Heights vs 1.39% in Patterson Lakes. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Patterson Lakes
Metric
Chelsea Heights

Price & Market

$1,575,000
Median house
$1,008,500
$710,000
Median unit
$778,000
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$420/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$396/wk
$430/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$412/wk
79.0%
Owner occupied
84.0%
15.0%
Renter occupied
13.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

8
Walk score
12
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
7,793
Population
5,393
46
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1040
Avg ICSEA
1079

Climate

639 mm
Annual rainfall
639 mm
25.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
25.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).