Side by sideSuburb comparison

Pitlochry vs Tugrabakh.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Pitlochry edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Pitlochry (978) sits above Tugrabakh (975).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Pitlochry edges out on average school ICSEA (978 vs 975).

Common questionsPitlochry vs Tugrabakh

Common questions

Does Pitlochry or Tugrabakh have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Pitlochry scores 978 vs 975 in Tugrabakh. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Pitlochry
Metric
Tugrabakh

Price & Market

–
Median house
–
–
Median unit
–
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
–
Days on market
–

Rental

$475/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$475/wk
–
Rent (unit / wk)
–
–
Owner occupied
92.0%
–
Renter occupied
21.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
–
Population
81
–
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

–
Flood class
–
–
Bushfire risk
–

Schools

3
Schools nearby
4
978
Avg ICSEA
975

Climate

–
Annual rainfall
–
–
Mean max (Jan)
–

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).