Side by sideSuburb comparison

Port Hacking vs Burraneer.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Port Hacking edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Port Hacking scores higher on walkability (16/100 vs 2/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsPort Hacking vs Burraneer

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Port Hacking or Burraneer?

Port Hacking scores 16/100 on walkability vs 2/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Port Hacking
Metric
Burraneer

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$500/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$500/wk
$795/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$660/wk
92.0%
Owner occupied
88.0%
7.0%
Renter occupied
10.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

16
Walk score
2
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
1,210
Population
3,719
40
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1093
Avg ICSEA
1093

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).