Side by sideSuburb comparison

Rand vs Brocklesby.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Brocklesby edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Brocklesby (994) sits above Rand (983). Rand skews owner-occupied (79%), Brocklesby runs more rental-dense (69% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Brocklesby edges out on average school ICSEA (994 vs 983). Rand also has a higher family-household share (73% vs 60%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsRand vs Brocklesby

Common questions

Does Rand or Brocklesby have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Brocklesby scores 994 vs 983 in Rand. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Rand
Metric
Brocklesby

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$256/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$256/wk
$120/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$158/wk
79.0%
Owner occupied
69.0%
11.0%
Renter occupied
15.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
192
Population
218
39
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

14
Schools nearby
20
983
Avg ICSEA
994

Climate

585 mm
Annual rainfall
585 mm
31.1°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.1°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).