Side by sideSuburb comparison

Rand vs Urangeline.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Rand edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Rand (983) sits above Urangeline (930). Urangeline skews owner-occupied (92%), Rand runs more rental-dense (79% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Rand edges out on average school ICSEA (983 vs 930). Rand also has a higher family-household share (73% vs 54%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsRand vs Urangeline

Common questions

Does Rand or Urangeline have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Rand scores 983 vs 930 in Urangeline. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Rand
Metric
Urangeline

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$256/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$194/wk
$120/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$165/wk
79.0%
Owner occupied
92.0%
11.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
192
Population
31
39
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

14
Schools nearby
7
983
Avg ICSEA
930

Climate

585 mm
Annual rainfall
585 mm
31.1°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.1°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).