Side by sideSuburb comparison

Riverina Mc vs Estella.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Estella scores higher on walkability (4/100 vs 6/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Riverina Mc (975) sits above Estella (972).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Riverina Mc edges out on average school ICSEA (975 vs 972).

Common questionsRiverina Mc vs Estella

Common questions

Does Riverina Mc or Estella have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Riverina Mc scores 975 vs 972 in Estella. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Riverina Mc or Estella?

Estella scores 6/100 on walkability vs 4/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Riverina Mc
Metric
Estella

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$315/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$268/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$380/wk
Owner occupied
59.0%
Renter occupied
30.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

4
Walk score
6
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
433
Population
2,541
20
Median age
34

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
975
Avg ICSEA
972

Climate

585 mm
Annual rainfall
585 mm
31.1°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.1°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).