Side by sideSuburb comparison

Run-O-Waters vs Goulburn.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,450,000 and $655,000. Goulburn edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Goulburn (median $655,000) is roughly 121% cheaper to buy into than Run-O-Waters ($1,450,000). Over the past year, Goulburn (+4.8%) ran 7.3 percentage points ahead of Run-O-Waters (-2.5%) on house-price growth.

Goulburn scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 86/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Run-O-Waters skews owner-occupied (93%), Goulburn runs more rental-dense (63% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Goulburn is the lower entry point at $655,000 median, 121% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Goulburn carries both higher gross yield (4.37% vs 1.97%) and stronger 12-month growth. On the headline numbers, it's the cleaner investor case of the two.

For families

Run-O-Waters has a heavier family-household mix (85% vs 64%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsRun-O-Waters vs Goulburn

Common questions

Is Run-O-Waters or Goulburn cheaper to buy in?

Goulburn has the lower median house price at $655,000, roughly 121% below Run-O-Waters ($1,450,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Run-O-Waters or Goulburn?

Over the past 12 months, Goulburn grew +4.8% vs -2.5% in Run-O-Waters, a gap of 7.3 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Which is more walkable, Run-O-Waters or Goulburn?

Goulburn scores 86/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Run-O-Waters or Goulburn?

Gross rental yield on houses is 4.37% in Goulburn vs 1.97% in Run-O-Waters. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Run-O-Waters
Metric
Goulburn

Price & Market

$1,450,000
Median house
$655,000
$269,280
Median unit
$565,000
-2.5%
Annual growth (house)
+4.8%
Days on market

Rental

$550/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$550/wk
$420/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$420/wk
93.0%
Owner occupied
63.0%
7.0%
Renter occupied
34.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
86
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
90
605
Population
23,963
46
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

15
Schools nearby
15
970
Avg ICSEA
970

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).