Side by sideSuburb comparison

Spring Mountain vs Kingsland.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Kingsland edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kingsland (899) sits above Spring Mountain (898). Kingsland skews owner-occupied (71%), Spring Mountain runs more rental-dense (50% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Kingsland edges out on average school ICSEA (899 vs 898).

Common questionsSpring Mountain vs Kingsland

Common questions

Does Spring Mountain or Kingsland have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kingsland scores 899 vs 898 in Spring Mountain. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Spring Mountain
Metric
Kingsland

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$270/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$225/wk
$274/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$100/wk
50.0%
Owner occupied
71.0%
50.0%
Renter occupied
100.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
20
Population
32
50
Median age
29

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
12
898
Avg ICSEA
899

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).