Side by sideSuburb comparison

Spring Mountain vs Matheson.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Matheson edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Matheson (942) sits above Spring Mountain (898). Matheson skews owner-occupied (87%), Spring Mountain runs more rental-dense (50% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Matheson edges out on average school ICSEA (942 vs 898). Matheson also has a higher family-household share (87% vs 50%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsSpring Mountain vs Matheson

Common questions

Does Spring Mountain or Matheson have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Matheson scores 942 vs 898 in Spring Mountain. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Spring Mountain
Metric
Matheson

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$270/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$225/wk
$274/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$284/wk
50.0%
Owner occupied
87.0%
50.0%
Renter occupied
27.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
20
Population
50
50
Median age
39

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
4
898
Avg ICSEA
942

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).