Side by sideSuburb comparison

Tilbuster vs Puddledock.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Tilbuster edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Tilbuster (1057) sits above Puddledock (958). Puddledock skews owner-occupied (118%), Tilbuster runs more rental-dense (107% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Tilbuster edges out on average school ICSEA (1057 vs 958). Tilbuster also has a higher family-household share (121% vs 76%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsTilbuster vs Puddledock

Common questions

Does Tilbuster or Puddledock have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Tilbuster scores 1057 vs 958 in Puddledock. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Tilbuster
Metric
Puddledock

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$290/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$290/wk
$550/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$220/wk
107.0%
Owner occupied
118.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
49
Population
41
50
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
18
1057
Avg ICSEA
958

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).