Side by sideSuburb comparison

Torrens Park vs Clapham.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $2,340,000 and $1,319,000. Torrens Park edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Clapham (median $1,319,000) is roughly 77% cheaper to buy into than Torrens Park ($2,340,000). Over the past year, Torrens Park (+4%) ran 4.0 percentage points ahead of Clapham (0%) on house-price growth.

Torrens Park scores higher on walkability (6/100 vs 2/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Torrens Park (1112) sits above Clapham (1102).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Clapham is the lower entry point at $1,319,000 median, 77% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Investors face a yield-versus-growth split: Clapham delivers the better gross yield (2.37% vs 1.56%), but Torrens Park has run faster on capital growth this year. The right pick depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow or capital appreciation.

For families

Torrens Park edges out on average school ICSEA (1112 vs 1102).

Common questionsTorrens Park vs Clapham

Common questions

Is Torrens Park or Clapham cheaper to buy in?

Clapham has the lower median house price at $1,319,000, roughly 77% below Torrens Park ($2,340,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Torrens Park or Clapham?

Over the past 12 months, Torrens Park grew +4% vs 0% in Clapham, a gap of 4.0 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Torrens Park or Clapham have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Torrens Park scores 1112 vs 1102 in Clapham. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Torrens Park or Clapham?

Torrens Park scores 6/100 on walkability vs 2/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Torrens Park or Clapham?

Gross rental yield on houses is 2.37% in Clapham vs 1.56% in Torrens Park. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Torrens Park
Metric
Clapham

Price & Market

$2,340,000
Median house
$1,319,000
$343,440
Median unit
$343,440
+4.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$700/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$600/wk
$550/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$525/wk
78.0%
Owner occupied
82.0%
20.0%
Renter occupied
16.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

6
Walk score
2
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
50
2,687
Population
1,685
43
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1112
Avg ICSEA
1102

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).