Side by sideSuburb comparison

Trial Harbour vs Granville Harbour.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Granville Harbour edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Granville Harbour (919) sits above Trial Harbour (911). Trial Harbour skews owner-occupied (118%), Granville Harbour runs more rental-dense (87% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Granville Harbour edges out on average school ICSEA (919 vs 911). Granville Harbour also has a higher family-household share (67% vs 45%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsTrial Harbour vs Granville Harbour

Common questions

Does Trial Harbour or Granville Harbour have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Granville Harbour scores 919 vs 911 in Trial Harbour. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Trial Harbour
Metric
Granville Harbour

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$160/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$160/wk
$136/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$136/wk
118.0%
Owner occupied
87.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
21
Population
30
65
Median age
62

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
1
911
Avg ICSEA
919

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).