W Tree vs Yalmy

W Tree scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving W Tree (1017) sits above Yalmy (944).

Buying in W Tree or Yalmy?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in W Tree? The free selling guide

W Tree and Yalmy side by side

MeasureW TreeYalmy
Renting
Owner occupied80.0%–
Schools
Schools nearby14
Average ICSEA1017944
Lifestyle and people
Walk score20
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population47–
Median age63–
Climate
Annual rainfall819 mm836 mm
Mean max, January24.9°C26.2°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
W Tree edges out on average school ICSEA (1017 vs 944).

W Tree vs Yalmy: common questions

Does W Tree or Yalmy have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), W Tree scores 1017 vs 944 in Yalmy. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, W Tree or Yalmy?

W Tree scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.