Your Property Guide

W Tree vs Murrindal

W Tree scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. W Tree skews owner-occupied (80%), Murrindal runs more rental-dense (56% owner).

Buying in W Tree or Murrindal?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in W Tree? The free selling guide

W Tree and Murrindal side by side

MeasureW TreeMurrindal
Renting
Owner occupied80.0%56.0%
Renter occupied–56.0%
Schools
Schools nearby11
Average ICSEA10171017
Lifestyle and people
Walk score20
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population478
Median age6361
Climate
Annual rainfall819 mm813 mm
Mean max, January24.9°C25.9°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

W Tree vs Murrindal: common questions

Which is more walkable, W Tree or Murrindal?

W Tree scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Keep comparing

Choosing between W Tree and Murrindal?

The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.

Get the free buying guide