Side by sideSuburb comparison

Wagstaffe vs Booker Bay.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Booker Bay edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Booker Bay scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 12/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Wagstaffe skews owner-occupied (86%), Booker Bay runs more rental-dense (64% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsWagstaffe vs Booker Bay

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Wagstaffe or Booker Bay?

Booker Bay scores 12/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Wagstaffe
Metric
Booker Bay

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$400/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$400/wk
$410/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$400/wk
86.0%
Owner occupied
64.0%
13.0%
Renter occupied
32.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
12
10
Transit score
10
75
Bike score
100
240
Population
1,442
60
Median age
54

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1037
Avg ICSEA
1037

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).