Side by sideSuburb comparison

Wakeley vs Canley Heights.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Canley Heights edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Canley Heights scores higher on walkability (30/100 vs 80/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Wakeley skews owner-occupied (72%), Canley Heights runs more rental-dense (57% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsWakeley vs Canley Heights

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Wakeley or Canley Heights?

Canley Heights scores 80/100 on walkability vs 30/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Wakeley
Metric
Canley Heights

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$460/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$350/wk
$450/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$400/wk
72.0%
Owner occupied
57.0%
24.0%
Renter occupied
39.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

30
Walk score
80
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
4,893
Population
12,320
41
Median age
37

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
955
Avg ICSEA
955

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).