Side by sideSuburb comparison

Wards Mistake vs Kookabookra.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Kookabookra skews owner-occupied (50%), Wards Mistake runs more rental-dense (20% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Wards Mistake has a heavier family-household mix (60% vs 50%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Wards Mistake
Metric
Kookabookra

Price & Market

–
Median house
–
–
Median unit
–
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
–
Days on market
–

Rental

$523/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$410/wk
$370/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
–
20.0%
Owner occupied
50.0%
–
Renter occupied
–

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
27
Population
19
51
Median age
37

Risk & Hazard

–
Flood class
–
–
Bushfire risk
–

Schools

5
Schools nearby
6
926
Avg ICSEA
926

Climate

–
Annual rainfall
–
–
Mean max (Jan)
–

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).