West Pennant Hills vs Baulkham Hills.
Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.
Baulkham Hills scores higher on walkability (10/100 vs 16/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving West Pennant Hills (1130) sits above Baulkham Hills (1111). West Pennant Hills skews owner-occupied (86%), Baulkham Hills runs more rental-dense (76% owner).
For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
West Pennant Hills edges out on average school ICSEA (1130 vs 1111).
Common questions
Does West Pennant Hills or Baulkham Hills have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), West Pennant Hills scores 1130 vs 1111 in Baulkham Hills. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, West Pennant Hills or Baulkham Hills?
Baulkham Hills scores 16/100 on walkability vs 10/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare West Pennant Hills against another suburb