Side by sideSuburb comparison

Windella vs Farley.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Farley edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Farley (988) sits above Windella (982). Windella skews owner-occupied (94%), Farley runs more rental-dense (47% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Farley edges out on average school ICSEA (988 vs 982). Windella also has a higher family-household share (94% vs 79%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsWindella vs Farley

Common questions

Does Windella or Farley have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Farley scores 988 vs 982 in Windella. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Windella
Metric
Farley

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$373/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$373/wk
$400/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$440/wk
94.0%
Owner occupied
47.0%
3.0%
Renter occupied
50.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
35
Bike score
100
845
Population
605
41
Median age
30

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

16
Schools nearby
20
982
Avg ICSEA
988

Climate

1143 mm
Annual rainfall
1143 mm
24.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
24.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).