Woodroffe vs Rosebery

Woodroffe scores higher on walkability (18/100 vs 16/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Woodroffe skews owner-occupied (56%), Rosebery runs more rental-dense (45% owner).

Buying in Woodroffe or Rosebery?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Woodroffe? The free selling guide

Woodroffe and Rosebery side by side

MeasureWoodroffeRosebery
Price and market
Median house$427,000–
Median unit$308,880–
Renting
House rent$370/wk$420/wk
Unit rent$360/wk$420/wk
Owner occupied56.0%45.0%
Renter occupied41.0%52.0%
Schools
Schools nearby1616
Average ICSEA943943
Lifestyle and people
Walk score1816
Transit score00
Bike score90100
Population3,1754,127
Median age3330
Climate
Annual rainfall1773 mm1773 mm
Mean max, January32.3°C32.3°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Woodroffe vs Rosebery: common questions

Which is more walkable, Woodroffe or Rosebery?

Woodroffe scores 18/100 on walkability vs 16/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.