Side by sideSuburb comparison

Woollamia vs Worrowing Heights.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Woollamia edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Woollamia (969) sits above Worrowing Heights (941). Woollamia skews owner-occupied (89%), Worrowing Heights runs more rental-dense (47% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Woollamia edges out on average school ICSEA (969 vs 941). Woollamia also has a higher family-household share (75% vs 59%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsWoollamia vs Worrowing Heights

Common questions

Does Woollamia or Worrowing Heights have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Woollamia scores 969 vs 941 in Worrowing Heights. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Woollamia
Metric
Worrowing Heights

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$360/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$360/wk
$320/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$187/wk
89.0%
Owner occupied
47.0%
7.0%
Renter occupied
5.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
100
653
Population
713
51
Median age
77

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
7
969
Avg ICSEA
941

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).