Side by sideSuburb comparison

Woollamia vs Huskisson.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,455,000 and $1,325,000.

Huskisson (median $1,325,000) is roughly 10% cheaper to buy into than Woollamia ($1,455,000). Over the past year, Woollamia (+3.9%) ran 19.2 percentage points ahead of Huskisson (-15.3%) on house-price growth.

Huskisson scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 18/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Woollamia (969) sits above Huskisson (967). Woollamia skews owner-occupied (89%), Huskisson runs more rental-dense (56% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Huskisson is the lower entry point at $1,325,000 median, 10% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Investors face a yield-versus-growth split: Huskisson delivers the better gross yield (2.39% vs 2.18%), but Woollamia has run faster on capital growth this year. The right pick depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow or capital appreciation.

For families

Woollamia edges out on average school ICSEA (969 vs 967). Woollamia also has a higher family-household share (75% vs 56%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsWoollamia vs Huskisson

Common questions

Is Woollamia or Huskisson cheaper to buy in?

Huskisson has the lower median house price at $1,325,000, roughly 10% below Woollamia ($1,455,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Woollamia or Huskisson?

Over the past 12 months, Woollamia grew +3.9% vs -15.3% in Huskisson, a gap of 19.2 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Woollamia or Huskisson have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Woollamia scores 969 vs 967 in Huskisson. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Woollamia or Huskisson?

Huskisson scores 18/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Woollamia or Huskisson?

Gross rental yield on houses is 2.39% in Huskisson vs 2.18% in Woollamia. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Woollamia
Metric
Huskisson

Price & Market

$1,455,000
Median house
$1,325,000
$274,320
Median unit
$274,320
+3.9%
Annual growth (house)
-15.3%
Days on market

Rental

$610/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$610/wk
$470/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$470/wk
89.0%
Owner occupied
56.0%
7.0%
Renter occupied
40.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
18
0
Transit score
20
0
Bike score
65
653
Population
840
51
Median age
56

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
6
969
Avg ICSEA
967

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).