Side by sideSuburb comparison

Woorinen vs Beverford.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Beverford edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Beverford (956) sits above Woorinen (955). Beverford skews owner-occupied (77%), Woorinen runs more rental-dense (65% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Beverford edges out on average school ICSEA (956 vs 955).

Common questionsWoorinen vs Beverford

Common questions

Does Woorinen or Beverford have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Beverford scores 956 vs 955 in Woorinen. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Woorinen
Metric
Beverford

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$150/wk
$300/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$150/wk
65.0%
Owner occupied
77.0%
22.0%
Renter occupied
15.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
262
Population
337
37
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
10
955
Avg ICSEA
956

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).