Side by sideSuburb comparison

Aberfoyle Park vs Coromandel Valley.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $941,688 and $1,226,500.

Aberfoyle Park (median $941,688) is roughly 23% cheaper to buy into than Coromandel Valley ($1,226,500). Over the past year, Aberfoyle Park (+20.7%) ran 20.7 percentage points ahead of Coromandel Valley (0%) on house-price growth.

Coromandel Valley scores higher on walkability (6/100 vs 8/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Coromandel Valley (1078) sits above Aberfoyle Park (1061). Coromandel Valley skews owner-occupied (92%), Aberfoyle Park runs more rental-dense (82% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Aberfoyle Park is the lower entry point at $941,688 median, 23% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Aberfoyle Park carries both higher gross yield (3.31% vs 2.52%) and stronger 12-month growth. On the headline numbers, it's the cleaner investor case of the two.

For families

Coromandel Valley edges out on average school ICSEA (1078 vs 1061).

Common questionsAberfoyle Park vs Coromandel Valley

Common questions

Is Aberfoyle Park or Coromandel Valley cheaper to buy in?

Aberfoyle Park has the lower median house price at $941,688, roughly 23% below Coromandel Valley ($1,226,500). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Aberfoyle Park or Coromandel Valley?

Over the past 12 months, Aberfoyle Park grew +20.7% vs 0% in Coromandel Valley, a gap of 20.7 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Aberfoyle Park or Coromandel Valley have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Coromandel Valley scores 1078 vs 1061 in Aberfoyle Park. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Aberfoyle Park or Coromandel Valley?

Coromandel Valley scores 8/100 on walkability vs 6/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Aberfoyle Park or Coromandel Valley?

Gross rental yield on houses is 3.31% in Aberfoyle Park vs 2.52% in Coromandel Valley. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Aberfoyle Park
Metric
Coromandel Valley

Price & Market

$941,688
Median house
$1,226,500
$252,000
Median unit
$308,880
+20.7%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$600/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$595/wk
$650/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$420/wk
82.0%
Owner occupied
92.0%
14.0%
Renter occupied
8.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

6
Walk score
8
0
Transit score
0
80
Bike score
100
11,234
Population
4,380
42
Median age
41

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1061
Avg ICSEA
1078

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).