Side by sideSuburb comparison

Abington vs Doolbi.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Doolbi scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 4/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Abington (954) sits above Doolbi (949).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Abington edges out on average school ICSEA (954 vs 949).

Common questionsAbington vs Doolbi

Common questions

Does Abington or Doolbi have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Abington scores 954 vs 949 in Doolbi. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Abington or Doolbi?

Doolbi scores 4/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Abington
Metric
Doolbi

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$280/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$280/wk
$238/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$255/wk
Owner occupied
88.0%
Renter occupied
13.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
4
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
8,048
Population
101
56
Median age
59

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
3
954
Avg ICSEA
949

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).