Side by sideSuburb comparison

Adelaide Park vs Pacific Heights.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Pacific Heights edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Pacific Heights (993) sits above Adelaide Park (989).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Pacific Heights edges out on average school ICSEA (993 vs 989).

Common questionsAdelaide Park vs Pacific Heights

Common questions

Does Adelaide Park or Pacific Heights have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Pacific Heights scores 993 vs 989 in Adelaide Park. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Adelaide Park
Metric
Pacific Heights

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$350/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$350/wk
$330/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$445/wk
87.0%
Owner occupied
86.0%
6.0%
Renter occupied
11.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
449
Population
1,111
42
Median age
45

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
8
989
Avg ICSEA
993

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).