Side by sideSuburb comparison

Alawa vs Jingili.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $575,000 and $649,000. Alawa edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Alawa (median $575,000) is roughly 11% cheaper to buy into than Jingili ($649,000).

Jingili skews owner-occupied (74%), Alawa runs more rental-dense (60% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Alawa is the lower entry point at $575,000 median, 11% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Alawa offers the higher gross rental yield (3.12% vs 2.76%), favouring cash-flow investors.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsAlawa vs Jingili

Common questions

Is Alawa or Jingili cheaper to buy in?

Alawa has the lower median house price at $575,000, roughly 11% below Jingili ($649,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Alawa or Jingili?

Gross rental yield on houses is 3.12% in Alawa vs 2.76% in Jingili. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Alawa
Metric
Jingili

Price & Market

$575,000
Median house
$649,000
$240,000
Median unit
$326,160
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$345/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$345/wk
$340/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$400/wk
60.0%
Owner occupied
74.0%
36.0%
Renter occupied
25.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

10
Walk score
10
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
2,078
Population
1,841
35
Median age
36

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
985
Avg ICSEA
985

Climate

1705 mm
Annual rainfall
1705 mm
31.8°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.8°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).