Almonds vs Lake Rowan

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Lake Rowan (998) sits above Almonds (993). Lake Rowan skews owner-occupied (81%), Almonds runs more rental-dense (42% owner).

Buying in Almonds or Lake Rowan?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Almonds? The free selling guide

Almonds and Lake Rowan side by side

MeasureAlmondsLake Rowan
Renting
Owner occupied42.0%81.0%
Schools
Schools nearby2020
Average ICSEA993998
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population3170
Median age3050
Climate
Annual rainfall511 mm489 mm
Mean max, January31.8°C32.1°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Lake Rowan edges out on average school ICSEA (998 vs 993). Lake Rowan also has a higher family-household share (76% vs 58%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Almonds vs Lake Rowan: common questions

Does Almonds or Lake Rowan have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Lake Rowan scores 998 vs 993 in Almonds. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.