Side by sideSuburb comparison

Anduramba vs Mountain Camp.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mountain Camp edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mountain Camp (982) sits above Anduramba (970). Mountain Camp skews owner-occupied (117%), Anduramba runs more rental-dense (74% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mountain Camp edges out on average school ICSEA (982 vs 970). Mountain Camp also has a higher family-household share (150% vs 96%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsAnduramba vs Mountain Camp

Common questions

Does Anduramba or Mountain Camp have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mountain Camp scores 982 vs 970 in Anduramba. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Anduramba
Metric
Mountain Camp

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$268/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$268/wk
$92/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$228/wk
74.0%
Owner occupied
117.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
84
Population
24
50
Median age
55

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

18
Schools nearby
2
970
Avg ICSEA
982

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).