Side by sideSuburb comparison

Anembo vs Tinderry.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,200,000 and $1,725,000. Anembo edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Anembo (median $1,200,000) is roughly 30% cheaper to buy into than Tinderry ($1,725,000).

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Anembo (1029) sits above Tinderry (1013). Anembo skews owner-occupied (95%), Tinderry runs more rental-dense (78% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Anembo is the lower entry point at $1,200,000 median, 30% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Anembo offers the higher gross rental yield (2.17% vs 0.60%), favouring cash-flow investors.

For families

Anembo edges out on average school ICSEA (1029 vs 1013). Tinderry also has a higher family-household share (111% vs 81%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsAnembo vs Tinderry

Common questions

Is Anembo or Tinderry cheaper to buy in?

Anembo has the lower median house price at $1,200,000, roughly 30% below Tinderry ($1,725,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Does Anembo or Tinderry have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Anembo scores 1029 vs 1013 in Tinderry. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Anembo or Tinderry?

Gross rental yield on houses is 2.17% in Anembo vs 0.60% in Tinderry. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Anembo
Metric
Tinderry

Price & Market

$1,200,000
Median house
$1,725,000
$377,280
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$500/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$129/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
95.0%
Owner occupied
78.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
72
Population
59
48
Median age
55

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
17
1029
Avg ICSEA
1013

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).