Side by sideSuburb comparison

Angus vs Berkshire Park.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $200,000 and $2,300,000. Angus edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Angus (median $200,000) is roughly 91% cheaper to buy into than Berkshire Park ($2,300,000). Over the past year, Angus (0%) ran 19.3 percentage points ahead of Berkshire Park (-19.3%) on house-price growth.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Angus is the lower entry point at $200,000 median, 91% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Angus carries both higher gross yield (22.10% vs 1.92%) and stronger 12-month growth. On the headline numbers, it's the cleaner investor case of the two.

For families

Berkshire Park has a heavier family-household mix (82% vs 70%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsAngus vs Berkshire Park

Common questions

Is Angus or Berkshire Park cheaper to buy in?

Angus has the lower median house price at $200,000, roughly 91% below Berkshire Park ($2,300,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Angus or Berkshire Park?

Over the past 12 months, Angus grew 0% vs -19.3% in Berkshire Park, a gap of 19.3 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Angus or Berkshire Park?

Gross rental yield on houses is 22.10% in Angus vs 1.92% in Berkshire Park. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Angus
Metric
Berkshire Park

Price & Market

$200,000
Median house
$2,300,000
$446,400
Median unit
$446,400
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
-19.3%
Days on market

Rental

$850/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$850/wk
$560/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$560/wk
69.0%
Owner occupied
70.0%
20.0%
Renter occupied
29.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
25
Bike score
25
384
Population
2,149
45
Median age
37

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
982
Avg ICSEA
982

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).