Side by sideSuburb comparison

Anmatjere vs Ti Tree.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Ti Tree edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Ti Tree scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 6/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Anmatjere has a heavier family-household mix (85% vs 63%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsAnmatjere vs Ti Tree

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Anmatjere or Ti Tree?

Ti Tree scores 6/100 on walkability vs 2/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Anmatjere
Metric
Ti Tree

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$75/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$75/wk
$73/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$25/wk
12.0%
Owner occupied
53.0%
Renter occupied
42.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

2
Walk score
6
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
446
Population
88
30
Median age
36

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

1
Schools nearby
1
641
Avg ICSEA
641

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).

Compare Anmatjere against another suburb

Or compare any two suburbs nationally →