Side by sideSuburb comparison

Apoinga vs Waterloo.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Apoinga edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Apoinga (980) sits above Waterloo (976). Apoinga skews owner-occupied (100%), Waterloo runs more rental-dense (68% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Apoinga edges out on average school ICSEA (980 vs 976). Waterloo also has a higher family-household share (53% vs 43%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsApoinga vs Waterloo

Common questions

Does Apoinga or Waterloo have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Apoinga scores 980 vs 976 in Waterloo. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Apoinga
Metric
Waterloo

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$100/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$73/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
68.0%
Renter occupied
12.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
29
Population
82
39
Median age
36

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
17
980
Avg ICSEA
976

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).