Side by sideSuburb comparison

Appila vs Stone Hut.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Stone Hut edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Stone Hut (981) sits above Appila (969).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Stone Hut edges out on average school ICSEA (981 vs 969). Appila also has a higher family-household share (79% vs 50%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsAppila vs Stone Hut

Common questions

Does Appila or Stone Hut have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Stone Hut scores 981 vs 969 in Appila. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Appila
Metric
Stone Hut

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$123/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$170/wk
73.0%
Owner occupied
72.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
10
91
Population
30
50
Median age
69

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
5
969
Avg ICSEA
981

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).