Apsley vs Wellington

Wellington scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 96/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Apsley skews owner-occupied (90%), Wellington runs more rental-dense (59% owner).

Buying in Apsley or Wellington?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Apsley? The free selling guide

Apsley and Wellington side by side

MeasureApsleyWellington
Price and market
Median house–$327,500
Median unit–$171,360
House price change, 12 months–+9.2%
Renting
House rent$450/wk$450/wk
Owner occupied90.0%59.0%
Renter occupied15.0%36.0%
Schools
Schools nearby44
Average ICSEA856856
Lifestyle and people
Walk score096
Transit score010
Bike score045
Population1164,096
Median age4741
Climate
Annual rainfall619 mm620 mm
Mean max, January33.1°C33.2°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Apsley has a heavier family-household mix (90% vs 60%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Apsley vs Wellington: common questions

Which is more walkable, Apsley or Wellington?

Wellington scores 96/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.