Side by sideSuburb comparison

Arthurton vs Clinton Centre.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Clinton Centre edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Clinton Centre (935) sits above Arthurton (919). Arthurton skews owner-occupied (84%), Clinton Centre runs more rental-dense (67% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Clinton Centre edges out on average school ICSEA (935 vs 919). Clinton Centre also has a higher family-household share (83% vs 72%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsArthurton vs Clinton Centre

Common questions

Does Arthurton or Clinton Centre have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Clinton Centre scores 935 vs 919 in Arthurton. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Arthurton
Metric
Clinton Centre

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$170/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$170/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$170/wk
84.0%
Owner occupied
67.0%
13.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
157
Population
40
48
Median age
39

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
8
919
Avg ICSEA
935

Climate

Annual rainfall
448 mm
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).