Side by sideSuburb comparison

Ascot vs Nobby.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Nobby scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 4/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Ascot (988) sits above Nobby (972).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Ascot edges out on average school ICSEA (988 vs 972).

Common questionsAscot vs Nobby

Common questions

Does Ascot or Nobby have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Ascot scores 988 vs 972 in Nobby. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Ascot or Nobby?

Nobby scores 4/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Ascot
Metric
Nobby

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$255/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$265/wk
$217/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$265/wk
Owner occupied
82.0%
Renter occupied
14.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
4
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
1,388
Population
609
41
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

11
Schools nearby
6
988
Avg ICSEA
972

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).