Side by sideSuburb comparison

Ashcroft vs Heckenberg.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Ashcroft edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Ashcroft (932) sits above Heckenberg (927).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Ashcroft edges out on average school ICSEA (932 vs 927).

Common questionsAshcroft vs Heckenberg

Common questions

Does Ashcroft or Heckenberg have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Ashcroft scores 932 vs 927 in Heckenberg. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Ashcroft
Metric
Heckenberg

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$350/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$350/wk
$295/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$300/wk
43.0%
Owner occupied
48.0%
51.0%
Renter occupied
49.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

2
Walk score
2
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
3,634
Population
3,263
32
Median age
32

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
932
Avg ICSEA
927

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).