Ashford vs Keswick

Keswick scores higher on walkability (28/100 vs 30/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

Buying in Ashford or Keswick?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Ashford? The free selling guide

Ashford and Keswick side by side

MeasureAshfordKeswick
Renting
House rent$815/wk$585/wk
Unit rent$520/wk$500/wk
Owner occupied40.0%45.0%
Renter occupied46.0%53.0%
Schools
Schools nearby2020
Average ICSEA10921092
Lifestyle and people
Walk score2830
Transit score00
Bike score100100
Population1,157754
Median age3533
Climate
Annual rainfall450 mm508 mm
Mean max, January29.1°C29.4°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Ashford vs Keswick: common questions

Which is more walkable, Ashford or Keswick?

Keswick scores 30/100 on walkability vs 28/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.