Augathella vs Ward

Augathella scores higher on walkability (24/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Ward skews owner-occupied (88%), Augathella runs more rental-dense (70% owner).

Buying in Augathella or Ward?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Augathella? The free selling guide

Augathella and Ward side by side

MeasureAugathellaWard
Renting
Owner occupied70.0%88.0%
Renter occupied16.0%–
Schools
Schools nearby10
Average ICSEA912–
Lifestyle and people
Walk score240
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population39387
Median age4736
Climate
Annual rainfall502 mm473 mm
Mean max, January35.2°C35.8°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Ward has a heavier family-household mix (80% vs 59%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Augathella vs Ward: common questions

Which is more walkable, Augathella or Ward?

Augathella scores 24/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.