Side by sideSuburb comparison

Avoca vs Svensson Heights.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Svensson Heights scores higher on walkability (4/100 vs 28/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Avoca (949) sits above Svensson Heights (945).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Avoca edges out on average school ICSEA (949 vs 945).

Common questionsAvoca vs Svensson Heights

Common questions

Does Avoca or Svensson Heights have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Avoca scores 949 vs 945 in Svensson Heights. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Avoca or Svensson Heights?

Svensson Heights scores 28/100 on walkability vs 4/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Avoca
Metric
Svensson Heights

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$620/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$570/wk
$242/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$265/wk
Owner occupied
58.0%
Renter occupied
40.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

4
Walk score
28
0
Transit score
0
65
Bike score
100
84,718
Population
3,334
46
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
949
Avg ICSEA
945

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).