Side by sideSuburb comparison

Bagot Well vs Kapunda.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Kapunda edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Kapunda scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 18/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Kapunda skews owner-occupied (79%), Bagot Well runs more rental-dense (60% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Bagot Well has a heavier family-household mix (77% vs 65%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsBagot Well vs Kapunda

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Bagot Well or Kapunda?

Kapunda scores 18/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Bagot Well
Metric
Kapunda

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$245/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$550/wk
$450/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$164/wk
60.0%
Owner occupied
79.0%
Renter occupied
19.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
18
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
10
67
Population
2,947
52
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
2
980
Avg ICSEA
980

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).