Side by sideSuburb comparison

Barossa Goldfields vs Yattalunga.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Barossa Goldfields edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Barossa Goldfields (1005) sits above Yattalunga (974). Barossa Goldfields skews owner-occupied (109%), Yattalunga runs more rental-dense (88% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Barossa Goldfields edges out on average school ICSEA (1005 vs 974).

Common questionsBarossa Goldfields vs Yattalunga

Common questions

Does Barossa Goldfields or Yattalunga have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Barossa Goldfields scores 1005 vs 974 in Yattalunga. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Barossa Goldfields
Metric
Yattalunga

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$500/wk
$360/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$280/wk
109.0%
Owner occupied
88.0%
Renter occupied
6.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
63
Population
319
47
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

11
Schools nearby
20
1005
Avg ICSEA
974

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).