Barretta vs Coningham

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Coningham (1050) sits above Barretta (1048). Coningham skews owner-occupied (88%), Barretta runs more rental-dense (56% owner).

Buying in Barretta or Coningham?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Barretta? The free selling guide

Barretta and Coningham side by side

MeasureBarrettaConingham
Renting
House rent$375/wk$375/wk
Unit rent$155/wk$318/wk
Owner occupied56.0%88.0%
Renter occupied12.0%12.0%
Schools
Schools nearby117
Average ICSEA10481050
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score6510
Population63328
Median age5640
Climate
Annual rainfall771 mm670 mm
Mean max, January21.9°C21.6°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Coningham edges out on average school ICSEA (1050 vs 1048). Coningham also has a higher family-household share (79% vs 35%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Barretta vs Coningham: common questions

Does Barretta or Coningham have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Coningham scores 1050 vs 1048 in Barretta. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.