Barrington vs Bowman

Barrington scores higher on walkability (4/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Bowman skews owner-occupied (100%), Barrington runs more rental-dense (87% owner).

Buying in Barrington or Bowman?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Barrington? The free selling guide

Barrington and Bowman side by side

MeasureBarringtonBowman
Price and market
Median house$1,040,000–
Median unit$205,920–
House price change, 12 months-1.0%–
Renting
House rent$475/wk$475/wk
Owner occupied87.0%100.0%
Renter occupied9.0%–
Schools
Schools nearby44
Average ICSEA975975
Lifestyle and people
Walk score40
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population394139
Median age5555
Climate
Annual rainfall938 mm1093 mm
Mean max, January30.0°C28.3°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Barrington vs Bowman: common questions

Which is more walkable, Barrington or Bowman?

Barrington scores 4/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.