Bass vs Kilcunda

Kilcunda scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 2/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Kilcunda (1012) sits above Bass (1000).

Buying in Bass or Kilcunda?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Bass? The free selling guide

Bass and Kilcunda side by side

MeasureBassKilcunda
Renting
Owner occupied83.0%85.0%
Renter occupied13.0%12.0%
Schools
Schools nearby143
Average ICSEA10001012
Lifestyle and people
Walk score02
Transit score00
Bike score070
Population405578
Median age4955
Climate
Annual rainfall779 mm863 mm
Mean max, January24.7°C24.3°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Kilcunda edges out on average school ICSEA (1012 vs 1000).

Bass vs Kilcunda: common questions

Does Bass or Kilcunda have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Kilcunda scores 1012 vs 1000 in Bass. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Bass or Kilcunda?

Kilcunda scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.