Side by sideSuburb comparison

Beach Holm vs Mount Low.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mount Low edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Mount Low (979) sits above Beach Holm (964). Beach Holm skews owner-occupied (95%), Mount Low runs more rental-dense (63% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mount Low edges out on average school ICSEA (979 vs 964). Mount Low also has a higher family-household share (85% vs 32%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBeach Holm vs Mount Low

Common questions

Does Beach Holm or Mount Low have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Mount Low scores 979 vs 964 in Beach Holm. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Beach Holm
Metric
Mount Low

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$355/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$570/wk
$180/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$370/wk
95.0%
Owner occupied
63.0%
Renter occupied
35.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
100
35
Population
5,488
53
Median age
29

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
9
964
Avg ICSEA
979

Climate

1036 mm
Annual rainfall
1036 mm
31.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).