Side by sideSuburb comparison

Beaver Rock vs Walkers Point.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Walkers Point edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Walkers Point (942) sits above Beaver Rock (938). Beaver Rock skews owner-occupied (88%), Walkers Point runs more rental-dense (56% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Walkers Point edges out on average school ICSEA (942 vs 938). Beaver Rock also has a higher family-household share (106% vs 62%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBeaver Rock vs Walkers Point

Common questions

Does Beaver Rock or Walkers Point have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Walkers Point scores 942 vs 938 in Beaver Rock. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Beaver Rock
Metric
Walkers Point

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$255/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$255/wk
$400/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
88.0%
Owner occupied
56.0%
25.0%
Renter occupied
32.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
56
Population
75
55
Median age
59

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

10
Schools nearby
13
938
Avg ICSEA
942

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).