Side by sideSuburb comparison

Beecher vs New Auckland.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. New Auckland edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving New Auckland (970) sits above Beecher (969). Beecher skews owner-occupied (93%), New Auckland runs more rental-dense (59% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

New Auckland edges out on average school ICSEA (970 vs 969). Beecher also has a higher family-household share (89% vs 73%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsBeecher vs New Auckland

Common questions

Does Beecher or New Auckland have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), New Auckland scores 970 vs 969 in Beecher. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Beecher
Metric
New Auckland

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$275/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$510/wk
$280/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$300/wk
93.0%
Owner occupied
59.0%
6.0%
Renter occupied
39.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
75
876
Population
5,266
44
Median age
33

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

14
Schools nearby
13
969
Avg ICSEA
970

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).