Beverley vs Kokeby

Beverley scores higher on walkability (50/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Beverley (935) sits above Kokeby (923). Kokeby skews owner-occupied (94%), Beverley runs more rental-dense (79% owner).

Buying in Beverley or Kokeby?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Beverley? The free selling guide

Beverley and Kokeby side by side

MeasureBeverleyKokeby
Renting
House rent$200/wk$200/wk
Unit rent$200/wk$138/wk
Owner occupied79.0%94.0%
Renter occupied13.0%9.0%
Schools
Schools nearby32
Average ICSEA935923
Lifestyle and people
Walk score500
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population1,10990
Median age5757
Climate
Annual rainfall397 mm392 mm
Mean max, January34.2°C34.0°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Beverley edges out on average school ICSEA (935 vs 923). Kokeby also has a higher family-household share (85% vs 62%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Beverley vs Kokeby: common questions

Does Beverley or Kokeby have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Beverley scores 935 vs 923 in Kokeby. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Beverley or Kokeby?

Beverley scores 50/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.